Thursday, August 28, 2008

Convention Dispatch: Dinner with the Ruling Class, Lunch In the Police State (6:01 pm)

As the world waits to hear Barack Obama’s message of change tonight at Invesco Field, I am still marveling at how I got to eat dinner last night with the American ruling class. Well, OK, not with, but near - and the experience was one of those “more things change, more things stay the same” moments that make it hard to hear Obama’s soothing bromides - and that led me to opt out of the final night of the convention.

Following Bill Clinton’s speech at the Pepsi Center, I headed over to Elway’s to have dinner with my friend Bill Hillsman, the iconoclastic media consultant who I got to know on Ned Lamont’s campaign. We were later joined by Working Families Party executive director Dan Cantor and a few other progressives, and our conversation inevitably ended up focusing on whether Barack Obama would really push the kind of change he is promising.

That’s when the ruling class showed up.

Over the course of about 10 minutes, a few Obama advisers trickled into the restaurant, followed by a flood of some of the biggest sharks that swim in the murky delta where money and Democratic politics meet. Among others, Bob Rubin (Citigroup chair), Larry Summers (former Treasury Secretary), Jim Johnson (political rainmaker) and Laura Tyson (former Clinton economic adviser) filed in and sat down at a long dinner table - clearly some kind of economic pow-wow with Obama officials, leavened with other political celebrities like former-vice-president-turned-corporate-board-member Walter Mondale and journalist Al Hunt.

I tried to capture the room in the picture at right. In the foreground you can see a goofy Hillsman posing as a bandit (left) and a grinning Cantor, and in the background, you can see those Ruling Class suits kibbutzing in the background (the tiny gray head above Hillsman’s head is Rubin’s). The whole scene really summed up the strange oxymoronic forces that collide at conventions like this. Here we were, progressive grassroots activists plotting how to pressure Obama to fulfill his populist promises on issues like trade and corporate power. And right next to us was a dinner party whereby the American Ruling Class feasted on the Obama campaign’s innards.

Yes, in some persistent ways, the more things change, the more they stay the same.

While my newspaper column tomorrow looks at some of the positive aspects of conventions, this dark conniving has been happening all over Denver this week, too. And unlike dinner last night, most of the worst kind of influence peddling happens in total secret at invitation-only parties like AT&T’s - the one that feted conservative Democratic lawmakers who recently granted that company legal immunity in the whole warrantless wiretapping scandal.

Perhaps most troubling has been the involvement of government security agencies in trying to repress those protesting and reporting on the corruption. During a walk through downtown at lunch today, the police were (as they have been all week) patrolling the street in full riot gear.

While I understand the need for security at events like this, the visual expression of force - the billy clubs, armor, helmets, and military-style patrols - are clearly designed to intimidate anyone from raising any kind of uncomfortable questions in any kind of public way. And that intimidation includes jailing reporters.

ABC News reports that just yesterday, “Police in Denver arrested an ABC News producer today as he and a camera crew were attempting to take pictures on a public sidewalk of Democratic senators and VIP donors leaving a private meeting at the Brown Palace Hotel.” ABC caught the whole thing on tape - and it perfectly captures the obscene use of Denver’s municipal government to trample the First Amendment and cover-up brazen corruption.

Denver’s municipal government has, in effect, used the need for enhanced security as a rationalization to declare a kind of marshal law over the whole city - a marshal law enforced by taxpayer-funded security forces whose mission is to serve the public, yet which has too often been deployed this week to crush the public and serve the private Big Money interests that still run the Democratic Party.

As a Denver taxpayer and voter, I am frankly embarrassed for my city, and for its political leaders. Nearly everyone I have talked to in my reporting during this convention has told me how disgusted they are at the city’s authoritarian response to what is supposed to be a celebration of democracy.

Between the scene at dinner last night and the constant sound of marching boots that continue to thrum through the Denver police state this week, I opted to bail out on Invesco and head home to my quiet residential neighborhood, where I’m confident that the event telecast will - as it always does - filter out all the real-life ugliness and substantive issues that this election and this convention is supposed to be about. Maybe that’s a cop out - like dropping some Soma in a Brave New World.

But then, at least for the final night, I’d rather remember this event for its truly valuable moments that brought together organizers and progressive movement builders, than for its moments that show the ugliest impulses of money, incumbency, and authoritarianism that still eat away at the Democratic Party.

posted by David Sirota

Reader Comments

American politics are as dirty on the Left as one the Right.  Red fat cats or Blue fat cats, it’s really all the same.  Dems just aren’t as naked in their greed and lust.

I was a bit appalled when Bill Clinton got all the applause after talking about the hard working american.  Don’t these people remember that it was Clinton that got NAFTA and GATT passed?  He is chiefly responsible for the gutting of the american work force yet there they were all teary eyed and cheering their lungs out.

Nothing could be better for the USA than getting a Democratic Socialist government into power but the american people, with their lack of intelligence and education, are more afraid of the word Socialist than they are Republican.  Idiots all.

posted by Gary L Green on 8-28-08 at 10:34 PM

I saw some videos of the police in riot gear, confronting the demonstrators. I even copied one onto one of my web pages. The police do look scary. The padded clothes mean that they are less sensitive and less vulnerable. The face masks, partly obscuring their faces, reduce their capability of expressing human emotion, thus forcing them to become less humane. It’s very intimidating. It’s a little like people in cars, who do things with road rage that they would never do if they fully visible.

Lately I’ve been wondering what is the rationale, the motivation, of the people who order such demonstrations of force against nonviolent demonstrators.  Is it because they do not understand the demonstrators are peaceful, and they really believe they are protecting the streets from sort of chaos and disorder? Or is it because they *do* understand that the demonstrators are peaceful, and that this very peacefulness exposes the authoritarianism of the power structure and thereby threatens it? But, no, the latter explanation doesn’t make sense: if the authoritarians understood that much, they would also understand that their Storm Trooper costumes reveal the nature of their authoritarianism even more. So I have to guess (and I’ll admit I’m guessing) that the authoritarians really don’t understand the situation.

posted by Eric Schechter on 8-28-08 at 10:45 PM

Discussion Closed

Commenting is closed on articles six months or older. This helps us prevent spam and maintain continuous discussions. We also close discussions from time to time that we are unable to moderate. Thanks for your understanding.