Friday, October 23, 2009

Noam Chomsky Rejected by Guantanamo (2:09 pm)

Two weeks ago, news broke that Noam Chomsky’s writings aren’t suitable reading for Guantanamo detainees.

The Miami Herald reports that a Pentagon defense lawyer sent an Arabic translation of Chomsky’s Interventions, published in 2007, to the prison camp’s library earlier this year. The lawyer’s donation was rejected without explanation, but was returned with a list of restricted literature, including that supposedly espousing “anti-American, anti-Semitic, anti-Western” ideology.

Chomsky, the prolific 80-year-old professor emeritus of linguistics at MIT, has been a prominent critic of American foreign policy since the Vietnam era. When he received news of the prison’s decision, he said: “This happens sometimes in totalitarian regimes.”

The post-9/11 essays comprising Interventions were originally distributed by the New York Times Syndicate as columns. (Earlier this year, In These Times began publishing Chomsky’s monthly column; the Times Syndicate told us no other U.S. publication publishes it.) The book discusses America’s international policy in the era of George W. Bush, fiercely criticizing the interventionist mentality that guides decision-making.

Gitmo’s library currently houses over 16,000 works, with Harry Potter a popular favorite. Although President Obama pledged to shut down the facility by early 2010, Guantanamo staff say they are trying to improve the quality of life at the polarizing prison until then.

A founding In These Times sponsor, Chomsky has been a good friend to the magazine since its inception. The affection is mutual: Last year, ITT offered Interventions as a gift to donors. The magazine’s staff is deeply disturbed by this blatant act of government censorship.

Chonsky’s most recent monthly column, “Barack Obama and the Unipolar Moment,” can be read here.

posted by Chenault Taylor

Reader Comments

Is this post criticizing a prison for having the same level of literary freedom as a totalitarian regime? I thought the whole point of a prison was to exert totalitarian control over its inmates’ lives.

Therefore, if the inmates are justly imprisoned, there is no problem here. And If the inmates are unjustly imprisoned, then the fact that they can’t read Noam Chomsky is sort of beside the point.

posted by Jian on 10-25-09 at 11:43 PM

that’s sounding is very imperative and thought provoking but like these issue and solution with arisen with it
thanks
Latest Tech News

posted by Latest Technology News on 10-29-09 at 10:54 AM

I had a great time reading around your post as I read it extensively. I am looking forward to hearing more from you.
Teeth Whitening

posted by William Robert on 10-31-09 at 5:59 AM

Comment Form