Wednesday, April 16, 2008
Inequality Kills (2:52 pm)
Public Broadcasting’s documentary series—such as Frontline and P.O.V.—are oases of thoughtful reporting amidst the hyperventilated frenzy of cable news. And a current series produced by the venerable California Newsreel ranks among the best of public broadcasting for tackling an intellectually tough but vital issue in a clear, expository and engaging fashion.
Unnatural Causes: Is Inequality Making Us Sick? looks at the myriad ways growing economic inequality in the United States makes Americans sicker and shortens their lives. This isn’t just about the effects of grinding poverty or the lack of health care that may first come to mind. Inequality hurts the health of everyone, up and down the income ladder—just moreso the lower someone ranks economically.
The key insight is that inequality creates stress, not only because of the income differences that create tensions over one’s ability to share in the life of one’s society but also because lower-ranked people have less control over their lives. Stress leads the body to create hormones like cortisol and adrenaline. Those chemicals are useful in sharpening response to a temporary threat—perhaps the approach of a wild animal. But over time they can contribute to weakened immune systems, hypertension, diabetes, cancer and a host of other ailments that particularly plague societies once they reach certain basic levels of nutrition and protection against infectious diseases.
The effects were quite dramatic in a study of British civil servants at Whitehall, the foreign ministry. Excluding other factors, such as personal habits, the research showed that mortality rates—roughly speaking, the chances of premature death—increased with every step down the occupational and income hierarchy.
Inequality kills.
The four-part series demonstrates how living in different neighborhoods matter, so the effects of inequality are transmitted through in the inequality of conditions where people live—neighborhoods in Seattle and Richmond, Calif., are contrastetd—as well as directly through effects of income and power at work. Another episode looks at contrasting communities in the Marshall Islands, where Marshallese with little power over their lives and resources in a tiny economy dominated by a U.S. military base have tuberculosis rates 23 times as high as in the United States. Yet another shows how American domination of the Pima tribe of Native Americans—depriving them of water and their traditional ways of life—also contributed to high rates of diabetes. And another carefully lays out research about how the strerss of racial inequality accounts for high premature birth rates and infant mortality, even when comparing blacks and whites in the U.S. of comparable income.
Using a visit to Greenville, Michigan, where Electrolux shut down the small town’s major employer and moved its refrigerator manufacturing to Mexico, Unnatural Causes shows how unemployment and economic dislocation led to a tripling of cases of suicide and depression in the year after the closing. By researcher Harvey Brenner’s calculations, the closing will lead to 134 “excess deaths.”
The series relies on reams of academic research and statistical inferences that most television producers, even on PBS, might have found daunting. But the arguments are laid out clearly and illustrated with moving encounters with people who daily face being sick and dying prematurely because of the high and growing economic inequality in America.
This post was written by ITT Senior Editor David Moberg, who has really been working overtime lately.
posted by Brian Cook
Reader Comments
Kim:
Try reading the New York Times - life spans for all demographics have not increased at equal rates. In fact, from the 1960s to 1980, gaps in infant mortality and life expectancy decreased between groups, but since 1980, the life expectancy of rich folks has grown faster than among the middle class and poor.
And if you’ll notice, the article (and series) mention that social conditions affect EVERYONE’S health, not just those at top and bottom. If you make $100,000 a year your health is likely to be worse than someone who makes $200,000 a year. The effect is greater for someone making $20,000 a year or less, but still, it’s not just about being poor.
But the real question is: what are we going to do about this? Maybe it’s obvious that being poor is bad for your health, but why - in the 21st century, in a society as rich as ours - is that acceptable?
posted by anonymous on 4-17-08 at 10:56 AM
anonymous - you agreed with me, but apparently unknowingly. In any case, if we want better health and life expectancy, we should east less and exercise more. Rich or poor.
posted by Kim on 4-18-08 at 12:57 PM
Discussion Closed
Commenting is closed on articles six months or older. This helps us prevent spam and maintain continuous discussions. We also close discussions from time to time that we are unable to moderate. Thanks for your understanding.

Wow. Being wealthy has its benefits and being poor sucks. Breaking news!
Still, one might notice that life spans have increased for all demographics. Just faster for some than others (nah, this won’t fit into the discussion).
posted by Kim on 4-17-08 at 9:02 AM